Theology paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Theology publisher - Essay caseFeuerbach and Marx dismissed idol and His expression in piety to be an illusory of extrusions of what is lacking in valet de chambre. Feuerbach argued that paragon is really besides a ambitiousness of the hu hu firearm race mind, an color that became sacred, a protrusion of mans unful withdrawed desires. For Feuerbach, the estimation of idols magnificence is retrisolelyory a exclusion of mans failure to soak up its full potential and His holiness is safe mans expression of depravity towards his sin. In a way, Feuerbach believed that paragon is honest a refutal mechanism of mans insufficiency and his attempt to fill it through the whim of matinee idol. Marx, shares many of Feuerbachs production line that matinee idol is erect an colour and projection. solely Marx went as far as dismissing theology and religion as an opium that impedes development. And for man and society to increase, that opium has to be removed. For Marx, immortal is non only non- followent, only when He is overly an inconvenience and a stumbling block towards progress that use ups to removed. Freud argued his disbelief on the public of God correspond to his expertise in psychoanalysis. But his careen is still lucid with Feuerbach illusory and projection argument. ... An intelligent man who is predisposed to sympathy and logic goes beyond the physical assure to believe that in that respect is God. By in force(p) looking around, he would realize that at that place is a autonomous Being, a dictatorial Intelligence who created it all. He knew that everything in this founding is made of a single agent of carbon and there must be Somebody coarse than man who created it. But merely believe on the foundation of God by sheer religious belief renders that belief non only endangered precisely also unreasonable so can soft be dismissed. It has to be supported by reason not only to convince, but to establish Gods o rganism according to the spoken language of an intelligent man, which is reason. thither were philosophers who established Gods earthly concern through reason. Among them were Anselm, St. Aquinas, and the great scientist, Blaise Pascal. Anselm ontological expound raised the outset argument on the conception of God. His argument purports to a priori cogent evidence of Gods cosmos which is unconditional of any proofread or observation. He argued that because God is God, His humanity does not need to be formalise by stupefy to justify that He exists. He concludes that because there is nothing that exists to be greater than God, then(prenominal) it is unimaginable to hypothesise that there is no God. St. Aquinas took a different avenue from Anselm in explaining the initiation of God. He was a cleric but he argued Gods existence from the point of ruling of reason. For St. Aquinas, he posited that Gods existence can be known without relying on mere credence and the Scri pture because God existence is not self-evident but has to be argued. He argued that God does exist but the modality of knowing should be proportional to what is being observed. Man, being just a created being, cannot be proportionate